Pseudoscience and pseudoscientists

Pseudoscience * is a term used to describe a claim, belief, or practice presented as scientific, but which does not adhere to the scientific method.[Note 1][3] A field, practice, or body of knowledge can reasonably be called pseudoscientific when it is presented as consistent with the norms of scientific research, but it demonstrably fails to meet these norms.[4]

 

Pseudoscience is often characterized by the following: contradictory, exaggerated or unprovable claims; over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts in the field; and absence of systematic practices when rationally developing theories. The term pseudoscience is often considered pejorative[5] because it suggests something is being inaccurately or even deceptively portrayed as science. Accordingly, those labeled as practicing or advocating pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.[6]

 

Science is distinguishable from revelationtheology, or spirituality in that it offers insight into the physical world obtained by empirical research and testing.[7] Commonly held beliefs in popular science may not meet the criteria of science.[8]"Pop science" may blur the divide between science and pseudoscience among the general public, and may also involve science fiction.[8] Pseudoscientific beliefs are widespread, even among science teachers and newspaper editors.[9]

 

The demarcation between science and pseudoscience has philosophical and scientific implications.[10] Differentiating science from pseudoscience has practical implications in the case of health careexpert testimonyenvironmental policies, and science education.[11] Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs such as those found in astrologyalchemymedical quackeryoccult beliefs, and creation science combined with scientific concepts, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[12][11]

 

Bibliography and Notes:

* Wikipedia.org ©

  1. Hansson, Sven Ove (2008). "Science and Pseudo-science". 
  2. Shermer (1997) 
  3. Wordnik, pseudoscience".
  4. Cover JA, Curd M (Eds, 1998) Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, 1–82.
  5. Hill, Sharon (January 30, 2013). "The Trouble with Pseudoscience – It Can Be a Catastrophe". Skeptical Inquirer. Retrieved April 25, 2015.  
  6. Hansson, Sven Ove (2008). "Science and Pseudoscience Section 2: The "science" of pseudoscience". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 
  7. Gould, Stephen Jay (1997). "Nonoverlapping magisteria". Natural History. 
  8. Pendle, George. "Popular Science Feature – When Science Fiction is Science Fact". 
  9. Art Hobson (2011). "Teaching Relevant Science for Scientific Literacy" (PDF). Journal of College Science Teaching.
  10. Imre Lakatos, Science and Pseudoscience, Science and Pseudoscience (transcript), Dept of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, 1973.  
  11. Hansson 2008 
  12. Hurd PD (June 1998). "Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing World". Science Education. 82 (3): 407–416. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G.(subscription required)


© 1999-2024 SUYUN All rights reserved.


Яндекс.Метрика

Language

Social networks